Framing example
This is a teaching example, not a live event
The framings below illustrate how a class of incident is typically presented across perspectives. They are not the output of any particular newsroom on any particular day. For methodology, see bias methodology.
The fact base every framing below is working from.
Linguistic and editorial signals to notice as you read the framings.
A sanctions package has been announced naming specific individuals and entities under a specified legal authority. The target rejects the designations. Affected third-country firms are reviewing compliance positions. Evasion-pattern analysis from prior comparable packages suggests partial impact.
New sanctions tighten the screws on the regime's financing of regional destabilisation, building on the existing architecture and closing identified evasion vectors. Compliance with international standards is expected of all jurisdictions.
Loaded terms
Typically omitted
The unilateral sanctions announced today are illegal under international law, target ordinary people and the economy at large, and will be circumvented as previous packages have been. Sanctions are an instrument of economic warfare, not legitimate statecraft.
Loaded terms
Typically omitted
The sanctions package extends extraterritorially to non-US firms doing business with the target. Compliance reviews will impose costs on third-country exporters and banks; humanitarian goods flows are at particular risk of over-compliance.
Loaded terms
The announcement comes during a period when backchannel talks were reportedly active. Whether the package includes adequate humanitarian carve-outs — and whether they will function in practice — deserves scrutiny.
Targeted measures against the entities financing the nuclear and missile programmes are a necessary complement to other policy instruments. Their effect on the timeline of these programmes is the relevant test.
Loaded terms
Read for what the designation actually does, who is listed, and what historical pattern of evasion exists. "Tightens the screws" and "illegal economic warfare" are framings; the legal authority used and the named entities are the facts.