Security Council Warned Iran Nuclear Stalemate Is Creating Oversight Vacuum
Iran war not over until enriched uranium removed, Netanyahu says The US-Israel war on Iran “accomplished a great deal,” but cannot be considered over until the Islamic Republic’s enriched uranium is moved outside its territory, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu argued in an interview broadcast Sunday night. Netanyahu, in his first American network TV sitdown since the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran Feb. 28, declined to say when such an operation would occur or who would be responsible for executing it, telling CBS “60 Minutes” correspondent Major Garrett that “you’re gonna ask me these questions. I’m gonna dodge them.” “I’m not gonna talk about military means, but the pres– what President Trump has said to me [is] ‘I want to go in there,’ and I think it can be done physically. That’s not the problem,” the 76-year-old said. “If you have an agreement, and you go in, and you take it out, why not? That’s the best way.” The interview aired hours after Trump publicly rebuked Iran’s response to a 14-point peace framework offered by the US, writing on social media that it was “TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE.” Tehran’s proposal made no mention of curbing its atomic ambitions, according to the official IRNA news agency, instead focusing on fully reopening the vital Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping before moving on to other contentious topics. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations nuclear watchdog, has said Iran has more than 970 pounds of uranium enriched up to 60% purity, a short technical step from weapons grade. The majority of Iran’s highly enriched uranium is likely at its Isfahan nuclear complex about 275 miles south of Tehran, IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi told The Associated Press last month. The facility was hit by US-Israeli airstrikes during the 12-day war last year and faced less intense attacks this year. Elsewhere in the interview, Netanyahu denied a report by the New York Times that he insisted to Trump before the war began that the US and Israel could succeed in overthrowing the theocratic regime that has run Iran since 1979. “We both agreed, you know, that there was both uncertainty and risk involved,” the PM said. “And I remember that we — I said, and he said — that the danger, there’s danger in action, in taking action. But there’s greater danger in not taking action.” Asked by Garrett if he believed it is “possible” to effect regime change in Iran, Netanyahu said: “I think that you can’t predict when that happen. Is it possible? Yes. Is it guaranteed? No.” Looking forward, Netanyahu claimed that he wanted to wean Israel off American military aid, which currently stands at $3.8 billion per year. “I want to draw down to zero the American financial support, the financial component of the military cooperation that we have,” he said. “Because we receive– we receive $3.8 billion a year. And I– I think that it’s time that we weaned ourselves from the remaining– military support. “I said, ‘Let’s start now and do it over the next decade, over the next ten years, but I want to start now. I don’t want to wait for the next Congress. I want to start now.'” With Post wires
Iranian Official
Iran strongly condemns the US-Israeli aggression as a blatant violation of its sovereignty, with Netanyahu’s demands to seize enriched uranium exposing their intent to disarm the nation’s legitimate nuclear capabilities. Tehran has resisted these threats by prioritizing the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz in its proposals, rejecting any framework that compromises national rights. The Islamic Republic remains steadfast in defending its territory against foreign occupation and interference.
Israeli
Prime Minister Netanyahu stressed that Israel’s defensive campaign against Iran cannot end until the regime’s vast enriched uranium stockpile is removed from its territory, given the existential nuclear threat it poses to the Jewish state. The joint US-Israel strikes inflicted major damage but left this core danger intact, underscoring the necessity of decisive action to neutralize Tehran’s atomic ambitions and its proxy networks before they can be reconstituted. Netanyahu indicated that physical removal remains feasible under a viable agreement, as Iran’s rejection of any curbs on its nuclear program confirms the ongoing imperative for Israeli vigilance.
Neutral
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated in a CBS "60 Minutes" interview aired Sunday that US and Israeli strikes on Iran had achieved significant results but that the conflict would not conclude until Iran's enriched uranium stocks were removed from its territory. Netanyahu declined to specify timing or responsibility for any such removal and referenced comments from President Trump on the matter. Trump separately described Iran's response to a US 14-point peace framework as unacceptable, while Iranian state media reported that Tehran's counterproposal addressed the Strait of Hormuz but made no reference to nuclear limits.
Western
Israeli and US precision strikes have delivered major strategic gains against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, but the operation cannot be considered complete until Tehran’s enriched uranium stockpile is removed to fully neutralize the proliferation threat. Netanyahu emphasized that any agreement allowing physical extraction of the material aligns with President Trump’s objectives, following Iran’s unacceptable refusal to curb its atomic ambitions in response to the US framework. The IAEA’s confirmation of Iran’s large uranium holdings highlights the persistent risk requiring sustained allied pressure.
Iran war not over until enriched uranium removed, Netanyahu says The US-Israel war on Iran “accomplished a great deal,” but cannot be considered over until the Islamic Republic’s enriched uranium is moved outside its territory, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu argued in …
See this event through different lenses
Compare how Western, Iranian, Israeli, Global South, and Pro-Peace perspectives frame this event.
Compare PerspectivesLoading notes...
Security Council Warned Iran Nuclear Stalemate Is Creating Oversight Vacuum
Security Council Press Statement on Death of Serbian Peacekeeper from United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon
Secretary-General Welcomes United States-Iran Peace Deal
Read the transcript of the US draft of the memorandum of understanding over Iran war
Pro-Peace
The US-Israel strikes on Iran, which Netanyahu claims have "accomplished a great deal," risk extending a conflict that has already imposed devastating humanitarian costs on civilians through disrupted lives, economic strain, and potential casualties in affected areas. Rather than pursuing risky military removal of enriched uranium, diplomatic alternatives like the US 14-point peace framework and Iran's focus on reopening the Strait of Hormuz provide viable paths to address nuclear concerns without further bloodshed. Prioritizing such negotiations could avert additional suffering and foster lasting regional stability.
Global South
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s insistence that the US-Israel strikes on Iran cannot end until its enriched uranium is removed externally reflects a classic neo-colonial bid to strip a sovereign Global South nation of its strategic assets under the guise of security. Iran’s counter-proposal, prioritizing the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and rejecting curbs on its nuclear program, underscores its determination to defend resource sovereignty against external diktats, while the IAEA’s selective monitoring exposes the institutional bias and failure of UN-affiliated bodies to shield non-aligned states from coercive interventions.